Cette UE vise à développer chez les étudiantes une pratique basée sur des données probantes (EBP) en intervention auprès des enfants avec des difficultés en mathématiques et à mettre à leur disposition des moyens et “ingrédients actifs” prouvés efficaces dans l’intervention en cognition mathématique.

Temps présentiel : 20 heures

Charge de travail étudiant : 75 heures

Méthode(s) d'évaluation : Examen final

Référence :
 Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Maracci, M. (2015). Multi-touch technology and preschoolers’ development of number-sense. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 7-27.  Bouck, E. C., & Park, J. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on mathematics manipulatives to support students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(1), 65-106.  Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400.  Chodura, S., Kuhn, J. T., & Holling, H. (2015). Interventions for children with mathematical difficulties: A meta-analysis. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 223(2), 129–144.  Dejonckheere, P. J., Smitsman, A. W., Desoete, A., Haeck, B., Ghyselinck, K., Hillaert, K., & Coppenolle, K. (2015). Early math learning with tablet PCs: The role of action. European Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 2(3), 79.  DeFouw, E. R., Codding, R. S., Collier-Meek, M. A., & Gould, K. M. (2018). Examining Dimensions of Treatment Intensity and Treatment Fidelity in Mathematics Intervention Research for Students at Risk. Remedial and Special Education, 0741932518774801.  Dowker, A., & Sigley, G. (2010). Targeted interventions for children with arithmetical difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2(7), 65–81.  Fischer, U., Moeller, K., Cress, U., & Nuerk, H. C. (2013). Interventions supporting children’s mathematics school success: A meta-analytic review. European Psychologist, 18(2), 89–113.  Fischer, U., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Cress, U., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Full-body movement in numerical trainings: a pilot study with an interactive whiteboard. International Journal of serious games, 2(4), 23-35.  Furlong M, McLoughlin F, McGilloway S, Geary D (2016). Interventions to improve mathematical performance for children with mathematical learning difficulties (MLD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art.No.:CD012130.  Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Concreteness Fading in Mathematics and Science Instruction: a Systematic Review. Education Psychology Review, 26, 9–25.  Gracia-Bafalluy, M., & Noel, M. P. (2008). Does finger training increase young children's numerical performance? Cortex, 44(4), 368-375.  Kaufmann, L., Handl, P., & Thony, B. (2003). Evaluation of a Numeracy Intervention Program Focusing on Basic Numerical Knowledge and Conceptual Knowledge : A Pilot Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 564–573.  Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and special education, 24(2), 97-114.  Kucian, K., Grond, U., Rotzer, S., Henzi, B., Schonmann, C., Plangger, F., ... & von Aster, M. (2011). Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia. NeuroImage, 57(3), 782-795.  Helloin, M. C. & Lafay (2018). DeCaLigne un programme d’intervention pour la Découverte du Calcul par la Ligne numérique. HappyNeuron : Grenade.  Hinton, V. M., Flores, M. M., Schweck, K., & Burton, M. E. (2016). The effects of a supplemental explicit counting intervention for preschool children. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60(3), 183-193.  Hyde, D. C., Khanum, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2014). Brief non-symbolic, approximate number practice enhances subsequent exact symbolic arithmetic in children. Cognition, 131(1), 92-107.  Jay, T., & Betenson, J. (2017). Mathematics at your fingertips: Testing a finger training intervention to improve quantitative skills. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 2, p. 22). Frontiers.  Lafay, A. & Helloin, M.C. (2019). SUBeCAL, un logiciel d’intervention du subitizing pour le calcul. HappyNeuron : Grenade.  Lafay, A., Osana, H. P., & Hadjadj, O. (15-16 juin 2019). The effects of detachability and countability of manipulatives on second-graders’ number knowledge. Symposium Unpacking Manipulatives: Recommendations for the Mathematics Classroom. The 2nd Mathematical Cognition and Learning Society Conference, Ottawa, Canada.  Lafay, A., Osana, H. P., & Valat, M. (2019). Effects of Interventions with Manipulatives on Immediate Learning, Maintenance, and Transfer in Children with Mathematics Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Education Research International.  Link, T., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Fischer, U., & Nuerk, H. C. (2013). Walk the number line–An embodied training of numerical concepts. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 74-84.  Link, T., Nuerk, H. C., & Moeller, K. (2014). On the relation between the mental number line and arithmetic competencies. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 67(8), 1597-1613.  Llyod (2013). Effects of Math Interventions on Elementary Students' Math Skills: A Meta-Analysis, Thesis, University of California.  Marcon, L. & Lafay, A. (sous presse). Trouble des apprentissages en mathématiques et ligne numérique : revue systématique de la littérature. Glossa.  McNeil, N. M., Uttal, D. H., Jarvin, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Should you show me the money? Concrete objects both hurt and help performance on mathematics problems. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 171–184.  McNeil, N. M., & Fyfe, E. R. (2012). “Concreteness fading” promotes transfer of mathematical knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 440-448.  Moeller, K., Fischer, U., Nuerk, H. C., & Cress, U. (2015). Computers in mathematics education–Training the mental number line. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 597-607.  Park, J., & Brannon, E. M. (2013). Training the approximate number system improves math proficiency. Psychological science, 24(10), 2013-2019.  Park, J., & Brannon, E. M. (2014). Improving arithmetic performance with number sense training: An investigation of underlying mechanism. Cognition, 133(1), 188-200.  Praet, M., & Desoete, A. (2014). Enhancing young children's arithmetic skills through non-intensive, computerised kindergarten interventions: A randomised controlled study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 56-65.  Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low‐income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child development, 79(2), 375-394.  Rasanen, P., Salminen, J., Wilson, A. J., Aunio, P., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Computer-assisted intervention for children with low numeracy skills. Cognitive Development, 24(4), 450-472.  Szűcs, D., & Myers, T. (2017). A critical analysis of design, facts, bias and inference in the approximate number system training literature: A systematic review. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 6, 187-203.  Wilson, A. J., Revkin, S. K., Cohen, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2006). An open trial assessment of"The Number Race", an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia. Behavioral and brain functions, 2(1), 20.